Changes

→‎Speculations: Obviously the relevant comparison is to the closest distance of the Moon to the Earth.
Line 354: Line 354:  
I'll do the same for the for the entry ''An extrapolation of time between the collapse of weaker arches  with still-standing stronger arches supports a young earth age.'', as I couldn't find such an extrapolation anywhere, especially not in the given source.
 
I'll do the same for the for the entry ''An extrapolation of time between the collapse of weaker arches  with still-standing stronger arches supports a young earth age.'', as I couldn't find such an extrapolation anywhere, especially not in the given source.
 
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 13:16, 26 June 2010 (EDT)
 
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 13:16, 26 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Frank, your comments are longwinded, but did you respond to the defect in your comparison of the distance that Moon recedes to its mean distance from the Earth?  Obviously the relevant comparison is to the closest distance of the Moon to the Earth.  Please respond to that relevant issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:35, 26 June 2010 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits