2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: +
no edit summary
::Care to refute it again? I must have missed it. Feel free to post your refutation on my talk page in a new section. It should be... interesting.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 02:14, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::Care to refute it again? I must have missed it. Feel free to post your refutation on my talk page in a new section. It should be... interesting.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 02:14, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:::It's still there in your archive, as per the link I gave, so I don't feel inclined to repeat it. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:25, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:::It's still there in your archive, as per the link I gave, so I don't feel inclined to repeat it. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:25, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::::It looks like you gave up on the argument after PalMD001 explained it to you, so I'm not going to say that you refuted anything. But most of the problems you raise seem to be the basic misunderstandings of how science adapts to deal with new evidence, and how that's different from falsifiability. As you said, a stegosaurus bone with a human bitemark would change a lot about dinosaurs. But it wouldn't change evolution, necessarily. It wouldn't disprove the 4.5bn year old earth. What "evidence" do you guys even have for an "old earth"? And if you say, "the Bible, that's it," I might scream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:03, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==