24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − "Accountable to no one, the WHO is a bureaucratic behemoth." <br> "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct." <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref>+ − + − +
format; remove unsourced quote
==Criticism==
==Criticism==
*"Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct." <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref>
"the World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor" <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>
*"the World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor" <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>
"So what's wrong with the WHO and Commonwealth Fund studies? Let me count the ways."
*"So what's wrong with the WHO and Commonwealth Fund studies? Let me count the ways."
<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/08/why_the_us_ranks_low_on_whos_h.html Why the U.S. Ranks Low on WHO's Health-Care Study</ref>
<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/08/why_the_us_ranks_low_on_whos_h.html Why the U.S. Ranks Low on WHO's Health-Care Study</ref>