5
edits
Changes
Debate:Are cats just useless Dogs (view source)
Revision as of 02:29, August 2, 2010
, 02:29, August 2, 2010no edit summary
:Hey PF Fox, I'm a scientist. I agree. They are genetically more similar than a European Garden Snail is to an African Land Snail, yet we'd still call both of these creatures 'snails'. It's our mamaliocentric view of life that makes us classify very similar animals as being different. (Like chimps and humans perhaps - sorry creationists, just playing devils advocate, this is conservapedia and we are all entitled to our views!) So lets hear it for Cogs, or is that Dats? [[user:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 08:42, 13 April 2007 (BST)
:Hey PF Fox, I'm a scientist. I agree. They are genetically more similar than a European Garden Snail is to an African Land Snail, yet we'd still call both of these creatures 'snails'. It's our mamaliocentric view of life that makes us classify very similar animals as being different. (Like chimps and humans perhaps - sorry creationists, just playing devils advocate, this is conservapedia and we are all entitled to our views!) So lets hear it for Cogs, or is that Dats? [[user:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 08:42, 13 April 2007 (BST)
::Actually, instead of "dogs" and "cats" we'll be calling them carnivores. However, since we're more familiar with them, we respect them more and call them more "proper" names.
==No==
==No==
Cats are different altogether from dogs. Some people(myself included) aren't fans of dogs.[[User:Nsmyth]] 09:15, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
Cats are different altogether from dogs. Some people(myself included) aren't fans of dogs.[[User:Nsmyth]] 09:15, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
[[User:DohSan|Master Doh-San]] 18:19, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
[[User:DohSan|Master Doh-San]] 18:19, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
Cats would be liberal if they were human. Superior? Nah, just annoying.- CB
* 11) http://icanhascheezburger.com/ (pretty much explains it all)
* 11) http://icanhascheezburger.com/ (pretty much explains it all)