Changes

¿Is good to have machismo? If Mr Dawkins no is machist then is good.  You say he respects women.--[[User:RobertoCuestion|RobertoCuestion]] 07:18, 4 August 2010 (EDT)

¿Is good to have machismo? If Mr Dawkins no is machist then is good.  You say he respects women.--[[User:RobertoCuestion|RobertoCuestion]] 07:18, 4 August 2010 (EDT)

:::I wrote:  "One of the definitions of machismo is an 'exhilarating sense of power or strength'.[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo]  Concerning Richard Dawkins' work, it would be very difficult for Señor Dawkins to have and exhilarating sense of power or strength....(I then explain why)."  Plus I wrote: "Also, given all the courageous Christian women martyrs in history, Christian women debate opponents could serve as a role model for Señor Dawkins so he could be less of  [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:Senor_Richard_Dawkins.jpg a chicken]. Through continual debating of worthy opponents perhaps some day Señor Dawkins could earn the right to debate one of the most manly Bible believers in all of Chistendom - Señor [[Chuck Norris]]." [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 12:20, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

:::I wrote:  "One of the definitions of machismo is an 'exhilarating sense of power or strength'.[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo]  Concerning Richard Dawkins' work, it would be very difficult for Señor Dawkins to have and exhilarating sense of power or strength....([[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|I then explain why]])."  Plus I wrote: "Also, given all the courageous Christian women martyrs in history, Christian women debate opponents could serve as a role model for Señor Dawkins so he could be less of  [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:Senor_Richard_Dawkins.jpg a chicken]. Through continual debating of worthy opponents perhaps some day Señor Dawkins could earn the right to debate one of the most manly Bible believers in all of Chistendom - Señor [[Chuck Norris]]." [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 12:20, 8 August 2010 (EDT)