88
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 17:47, April 2, 2007
, 17:47, April 2, 2007→Sex and wikipedia
I find it personally offensive that you use the word "Sex" in the #3 item on the list. Impressionable youngsters could read that word and then go out and do orgies and the drugs. Also, you link to Wikipedia in the item, which is known to be a repository of pornography and depravity. How dare you damage our nations youth in such a way? For shame.
I find it personally offensive that you use the word "Sex" in the #3 item on the list. Impressionable youngsters could read that word and then go out and do orgies and the drugs. Also, you link to Wikipedia in the item, which is known to be a repository of pornography and depravity. How dare you damage our nations youth in such a way? For shame.
:::: On an entirely serious note, the article will inevitably have the effect of leading readers to sex-related wikipedia articles, as it did me. I use wikipedia nearly daily and I've never seen any of that content, likely never would have, until conservapedia pointed it out to me. BTW, I'm not thankful. I'd rather avoid that kind of stuff as much as possible, I can't miss the irony that editors here are so proactively inviting their readers to look at that stuff . . . what gives? [[User:Godman|Godman]] 13:47, 2 April 2007 (EDT)