| Line 556: |
Line 556: |
| | I find it personally offensive that you use the word "Sex" in the #3 item on the list. Impressionable youngsters could read that word and then go out and do orgies and the drugs. Also, you link to Wikipedia in the item, which is known to be a repository of pornography and depravity. How dare you damage our nations youth in such a way? For shame. | | I find it personally offensive that you use the word "Sex" in the #3 item on the list. Impressionable youngsters could read that word and then go out and do orgies and the drugs. Also, you link to Wikipedia in the item, which is known to be a repository of pornography and depravity. How dare you damage our nations youth in such a way? For shame. |
| | :::: On an entirely serious note, the article will inevitably have the effect of leading readers to sex-related wikipedia articles, as it did me. I use wikipedia nearly daily and I've never seen any of that content, likely never would have, until conservapedia pointed it out to me. BTW, I'm not thankful. I'd rather avoid that kind of stuff as much as possible, I can't miss the irony that editors here are so proactively inviting their readers to look at that stuff . . . what gives? [[User:Godman|Godman]] 13:47, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | | :::: On an entirely serious note, the article will inevitably have the effect of leading readers to sex-related wikipedia articles, as it did me. I use wikipedia nearly daily and I've never seen any of that content, likely never would have, until conservapedia pointed it out to me. BTW, I'm not thankful. I'd rather avoid that kind of stuff as much as possible, I can't miss the irony that editors here are so proactively inviting their readers to look at that stuff . . . what gives? [[User:Godman|Godman]] 13:47, 2 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | : "What gives" indeed. Mr. "Godman", I've reviewed your edits and found them to be deficient. A gossipy attack on Pat Robertson by someone who calls himself "Godman" and describes himself as a Christian??? Please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:06, 2 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | :::::Agreed. It had the same "GO FIND SEX STUFF AT THIS LOCATION" effect on me. I didn't even know there's a "List of sex positions" or a "List of female porn stars by decade" on Wikipedia, but now I've seen them. Great job at not guiding people to potentially non-family-friendly material, Andy. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 14:04, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | | :::::Agreed. It had the same "GO FIND SEX STUFF AT THIS LOCATION" effect on me. I didn't even know there's a "List of sex positions" or a "List of female porn stars by decade" on Wikipedia, but now I've seen them. Great job at not guiding people to potentially non-family-friendly material, Andy. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 14:04, 2 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | : Sid, I think that's the first conservative edit you've made! Are you really changing your views? Have you complained to Wikipedia about its obscenity yet? Please let us know when you do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:06, 2 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | : More generally, the above two comments by people who I assume are liberals are enlightening. They use conservative arguments to oppose exposing a liberal project!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:06, 2 April 2007 (EDT) |