SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
703
edits
Changes
→Aftermath
:I can agree to accept that, but your edit that I reversed doesn't seem to reflect what you are saying here.... --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:54, 20 September 2010 (EDT)
:I can agree to accept that, but your edit that I reversed doesn't seem to reflect what you are saying here.... --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:54, 20 September 2010 (EDT)
::I made three changes. One, I lowered the number of Indochinese killed in the ongoing war after US withdrawal, because the current number is legitimately too high. I raised Laos to 100-200,000 killed (from "over 100,000"), and I got rid of the 1.39 million figure for executions under the Khmer Rouge. Although that number most surely ''does'' fall within the accepted range of estimates, the number itself has no clear source. Which of these do you you have a problem with?[[User: JakeRMurrin]]
::Everyone gets upset when discussing genocide, [[Holocaust]]s, and mass murder. The main point that conservatives want to bring out - and which liberals, contrariwise, want to [[censorship|suppress]], is that Communist dictators have '''murdered''' huge numbers of people in the name of Communism; and that this is '''because''' Communism is an evil, anti-human ideology (even though it masquerades or camouflages itself in the mantle of "[[humanism]]"). I daresay that '''anything''' [[atheist]]ic is bound to turn out badly, despite the existence of the odd "ethical" humanist among their ranks. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:02, 20 September 2010 (EDT)
::Everyone gets upset when discussing genocide, [[Holocaust]]s, and mass murder. The main point that conservatives want to bring out - and which liberals, contrariwise, want to [[censorship|suppress]], is that Communist dictators have '''murdered''' huge numbers of people in the name of Communism; and that this is '''because''' Communism is an evil, anti-human ideology (even though it masquerades or camouflages itself in the mantle of "[[humanism]]"). I daresay that '''anything''' [[atheist]]ic is bound to turn out badly, despite the existence of the odd "ethical" humanist among their ranks. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:02, 20 September 2010 (EDT)