::First point: why is your statistic based on thin air:
::First point: why is your statistic based on thin air:
−
::* It relies on raw data from a self-selected sample (This alone would do it)
+
::* It relies on raw data from a self-selected sample (This alone renders any conclusion useless. This is a Stats 101 mortal sin.)
−
::* You compare the outcome of a poll with 3 possible answers, to one with 131 different answers.
+
::* You compare the outcome of a poll with 3 possible answers, to one with 131 different answers (another stats 101 mortal sin).
−
::* You compare the outcome of a poll where you can only choose one option, with one where you choose as many options as you like
+
::* You compare the outcome of a poll where you can only choose one option, with one where you choose as many options as you like (yet another mortal sin).
−
::* Wikipedia is not measured by the wikipedians, but by the articles that wikipedians write.
+
::* Wikipedia is not measured by the wikipedians, but by the articles that wikipedians write. (a forgivable sin, good on you)
::Second point: That I never proposed an alternative.
::Second point: That I never proposed an alternative.