Changes

:::If the article had, say: given the titles of Orr's books; and mentioned a single source, such as a print biography, for the facts in the article; or quoted a reasonable published source giving the title of one of Orr's hymns and a comment about its being familiar or beloved or anything like that, I don't think it would have been deleted.

:::If the article had, say: given the titles of Orr's books; and mentioned a single source, such as a print biography, for the facts in the article; or quoted a reasonable published source giving the title of one of Orr's hymns and a comment about its being familiar or beloved or anything like that, I don't think it would have been deleted.

:::It was not deleted because of bias or anything like that, it was deleted because the contributor didn't do a good enough job of writing the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:22, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

:::It was a case of someone borderline-notable, probably notable for a Wikipedia article, whose article was deleted because the contributor didn't create a very good article and apparently didn't take any actions to defend it other than just blindly recreating the same very short article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)