351
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + +
no edit summary
::::::::::You're not reading what I wrote. It's a false claim. He hasn't justified it. All he did was state it and say there's a dispute. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:55, 31 December 2010 (EST)
::::::::::You're not reading what I wrote. It's a false claim. He hasn't justified it. All he did was state it and say there's a dispute. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:55, 31 December 2010 (EST)
:::::::::::Then go find us some proof that it's false, please. I'm genuinely curious now. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 16:22, 31 December 2010 (EST)
:::::::::::Then go find us some proof that it's false, please. I'm genuinely curious now. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 16:22, 31 December 2010 (EST)
Well, we all agree that some Protestants do believe that way. And we are in agreement that Catholics deny the accusation. There is no obligation on anyone's part to prove either party correct, even if that were possible. But may I also point out that (IMO) the issue doesn't belong on that page anyway. The article is entitled "Virgin Birth" and it deals with the Virgin Birth, not all things that in some way relate to the Virgin. I'm willing to include an explanation of WHY those Protestants who believe Mary is worshipped feel as they do, as well as the reason why Catholics believe that their veneration (Nate's chosen word) of Mary does not constitute worship of her. However, a better way to go would be to strike the line altogether for the reason explained above. How about that? --[[User:Wycliffe|Wycliffe]] 16:57, 31 December 2010 (EST)