| | ::::--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 15:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | | ::::--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 15:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | :::: Aschlafly is simply being provocative and seeking to generate interest in this site in the mold of Ann Coulter. Don't take him too seriously. That is why he put the bit about sex on the main page, to titulate. That is why he says stuff like "There is a pro-pornography bias on Wikipedia, and this is correlated to a liberal bias. " to inflame. And that is why he answer direct questions about obvious holes in his arguments with personal and generally ridiculous attacks, to deflect. The man is simply a radical, faux-christian impressario with bad manners, poor judgment and , at best, tenuous grasp of the truth -- he certainly doesn't rely on it much. My real concern is for the children apparently under his tutelage. They are in for a rude awakening if they ever extract themselves from hate-filled network of lies, half-truths and half-baked ideas about anything he doesn't like or understand. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 17:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | | :::: Aschlafly is simply being provocative and seeking to generate interest in this site in the mold of Ann Coulter. Don't take him too seriously. That is why he put the bit about sex on the main page, to titulate. That is why he says stuff like "There is a pro-pornography bias on Wikipedia, and this is correlated to a liberal bias. " to inflame. And that is why he answer direct questions about obvious holes in his arguments with personal and generally ridiculous attacks, to deflect. The man is simply a radical, faux-christian impressario with bad manners, poor judgment and , at best, tenuous grasp of the truth -- he certainly doesn't rely on it much. My real concern is for the children apparently under his tutelage. They are in for a rude awakening if they ever extract themselves from hate-filled network of lies, half-truths and half-baked ideas about anything he doesn't like or understand. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 17:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | ::: Folks, I presume you have strong liberal beliefs. You are welcome to them. I'm not going to spend all day dealing with your sarcasm, rule violations, denials, etc. I am happy to debate sincere statements and you are welcome to review entries here. Support for less regulation of pornography is a liberal position. It's obvious, and I don't think anyone seriously disputes it. |
| | + | ::: Maybe you can explain this puzzle. Conservatives freely admit their views and sincerely defend their principles. Why do so many liberals deny they are liberal, deny basic liberal positions, and seek to pretend there is not a liberal bias?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |