1,767
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 10:16, April 4, 2007
, 10:16, April 4, 2007→Rule against templates
*Sid, your post is inappropriate because you haven't been appointed their advocate. It would be appropriate for them to post here, when back, protesting. You deciding, on your own, to say the act isn't vandalism, won't change the fact that it was. '''Vandalism is against our rules.''' Quit taking up causes to merely stir the pot. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 06:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
*Sid, your post is inappropriate because you haven't been appointed their advocate. It would be appropriate for them to post here, when back, protesting. You deciding, on your own, to say the act isn't vandalism, won't change the fact that it was. '''Vandalism is against our rules.''' Quit taking up causes to merely stir the pot. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 06:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::You forget that you also banned me for allegedly placing an unauthorized template. Besides, I don't ''have'' to be "appointed" to be the "advocate" of anybody. This isn't a court or a republic, it's a freaking WIKI. You just assert that people break rules, you assert that I am not authorized to speak for anybody else, you assert that this is a republic. I honestly don't want this to turn into another lengthy discussion. My request was sincere. The end. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 06:16, 4 April 2007 (EDT)