SkipCaptcha
1,125
edits
Changes
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 03:11, March 25, 2011
, 03:11, March 25, 2011→No animal exhibits religion
::::::: If the laws of thermodynamics apply here, then the [[molecular biology]] of living creatures should not be getting more complex as time goes on. "As usable energy is irretrievably lost, disorganization, randomness and chaos increase." [http://www.allaboutscience.org/second-law-of-thermodynamics.htm] How do evolution's advocates (especially the atheists) explain the increased complexity and organization which we see in the [[fossil record]], when the theory which all scientists accept predicts instead an increase of randomness and chaos? (See also, [[Entropy]]) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:05, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
::::::: If the laws of thermodynamics apply here, then the [[molecular biology]] of living creatures should not be getting more complex as time goes on. "As usable energy is irretrievably lost, disorganization, randomness and chaos increase." [http://www.allaboutscience.org/second-law-of-thermodynamics.htm] How do evolution's advocates (especially the atheists) explain the increased complexity and organization which we see in the [[fossil record]], when the theory which all scientists accept predicts instead an increase of randomness and chaos? (See also, [[Entropy]]) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:05, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
::::::::Interesting take Ed. The way I was taught is that man is an animal and still the same flesh and bone as an animal but has been blessed with the spirit of the lord. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:11, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==