Changes

Line 499: Line 499:     
First of all I would like to thank the authors for your counterexamples. I allway accepted the Old Earth Theory, without thinking too much about it. This article has certainly given me some new perspectives.
 
First of all I would like to thank the authors for your counterexamples. I allway accepted the Old Earth Theory, without thinking too much about it. This article has certainly given me some new perspectives.
−
But: I think quite a few of the counterexamples could be merged together. For instance: In Astronomy: Counterexample nr. 1 and nr. 6 say basically the same thing: the moons orbit is unstable, thus it could not have existed billions of years before, since it would have collided with the earth.
  −
The same goes for counterexamples nr. 2 and 4. The basic statement is: spiral galaxies are rather young.
  −
Similar redundancy can be seen in the Geology section.
  −
I think it would improve the article if there were fewer counterexamples, that state basically the same thing. But that's just my two cents.
  −
À Dieu
  −
  −
== Merging of some counterexamples? ==
  −
  −
First of all I would like to thank the authors for your counterexamples. I allways accepted the Old Earth Theory, without thinking too much about it. This article has certainly given me some new perspectives.
   
But: I think quite a few of the counterexamples could be merged together. For instance: In Astronomy: Counterexample nr. 1 and nr. 6 say basically the same thing: the moons orbit is unstable, thus it could not have existed billions of years before, since it would have collided with the earth.
 
But: I think quite a few of the counterexamples could be merged together. For instance: In Astronomy: Counterexample nr. 1 and nr. 6 say basically the same thing: the moons orbit is unstable, thus it could not have existed billions of years before, since it would have collided with the earth.
 
The same goes for counterexamples nr. 2 and 4. The basic statement is: spiral galaxies are rather young.
 
The same goes for counterexamples nr. 2 and 4. The basic statement is: spiral galaxies are rather young.
199

edits