Changes

Line 21: Line 21:  
Perhaps you might want to cite some of the "fashion disaster" claims, especially since her favorite designer has done quite well since Michelle became first lady.  Also, if you're going to argue that she is a fashion disaster, then you might not want to do it next to a picture of her looking fashionable and stately! [[User:DanieleGiusto|DanieleGiusto]] 13:44, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
 
Perhaps you might want to cite some of the "fashion disaster" claims, especially since her favorite designer has done quite well since Michelle became first lady.  Also, if you're going to argue that she is a fashion disaster, then you might not want to do it next to a picture of her looking fashionable and stately! [[User:DanieleGiusto|DanieleGiusto]] 13:44, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
 
:You may think that Michelle looks fashionable and stately, most people disagree. Anyway, added refs and a new pic.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:52, 3 August 2010 (EDT)
 
:You may think that Michelle looks fashionable and stately, most people disagree. Anyway, added refs and a new pic.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:52, 3 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
:I don't have an opinion on her fashion either way, but this does seem opinion-driven, and I can't find all the claims in the refs. Could someone who does care about this cite them individually, or select phrases that were actually used in articles? I just think it takes away from the weight of the more substantial claims on the page if we have uncited opinions on her fashion [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 18:00, 3 May 2011 (EDT)
    
== Santeria ==
 
== Santeria ==
    
This "fact" was never proven by any reputable sources...seeing as it could be extremely libelous (and likely is) I removed it. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 00:10, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
 
This "fact" was never proven by any reputable sources...seeing as it could be extremely libelous (and likely is) I removed it. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 00:10, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
234

edits