Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
→Why should there be a debate?: Because people disagree, that's why
Anyway ... that's just one humble editor's opinion. So long as I feel that Conservapedia is heading in the right direction, I'm going to continue to edit and augment articles such as [[Virginia]] (a work in progress) and [[Oriental]]. Please feel free to edit my work or remain similarly critical of what I've put together. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 08:28, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Anyway ... that's just one humble editor's opinion. So long as I feel that Conservapedia is heading in the right direction, I'm going to continue to edit and augment articles such as [[Virginia]] (a work in progress) and [[Oriental]]. Please feel free to edit my work or remain similarly critical of what I've put together. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 08:28, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:On first glance, this appears sound. Thanks for coming over.
:We have a template somewhere on 'how to format a science article', and your suggestions could form a template on 'how to write on a controversial topic'.
:Let's practice, however, on several topics other than [[Theory of evolution]], and see if we can forge a good working relationship amongst the more prolific and thoughtful contributing editors here. Please give it time. Even six weeks would be a remarkably short time for this.
:It takes the average person 72 hours to change their mind about something.{fact-science} ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:23, 5 April 2007 (EDT)