159
edits
Changes
→Hoatzin
So, if I am correct, the development of claws in the wings of the hoatzin goes against Evolution because it would represent an unexplicable evolutionary step backward for the species? If I can find the right wording I might already add a stub paragraph to the article :) --[[User:LeonardO|Leo-from-UK]] 11:42, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
So, if I am correct, the development of claws in the wings of the hoatzin goes against Evolution because it would represent an unexplicable evolutionary step backward for the species? If I can find the right wording I might already add a stub paragraph to the article :) --[[User:LeonardO|Leo-from-UK]] 11:42, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
:You hit the nail on the head; it is an unexplicable - ''unexplainable'' - evolutionary step backward. In order to properly explain this animal, evolutionists have to explain a reason for it to get these claws back, which means giving the hoatzin an intelligence it doesn't possess. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:48, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
:You hit the nail on the head; it is an unexplicable - ''unexplainable'' - evolutionary step backward. In order to properly explain this animal, evolutionists have to explain a reason for it to get these claws back, which means giving the hoatzin an intelligence it doesn't possess. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:48, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
::Thanks for clearing things up for me. I added a few words to the article to make it clearer for everyone WHY such a feature goes against Evolution, but I still believe that it would be nice to expand on it, and to give this matter its own paragraph in the article, eventually. It is not a high priority, of course. --[[User:LeonardO|Leo-from-UK]] 11:59, 22 June 2011 (EDT)