Changes

:::From your response it sounds like you would not accept The New York Times or The Washington Post as sources for the purpose of the raid, so I withdraw my suggested edits. Still, the article doesn't make much sense as it stands. Perhaps you would consider something like "The claimed purpose of the raid...". Also, I forgot to mention that SEALs is typically written using all caps, but I don't have a source for this baseless assertion. Good luck with this article.-[[User:Bwebster|Bwebster]] 12:30, 30 May 2011 (EDT)

:::From your response it sounds like you would not accept The New York Times or The Washington Post as sources for the purpose of the raid, so I withdraw my suggested edits. Still, the article doesn't make much sense as it stands. Perhaps you would consider something like "The claimed purpose of the raid...". Also, I forgot to mention that SEALs is typically written using all caps, but I don't have a source for this baseless assertion. Good luck with this article.-[[User:Bwebster|Bwebster]] 12:30, 30 May 2011 (EDT)

::::They would not be sources unless they had direct knowledge, i.e. were invovled in the planning process, is that not correct? Otherwise, they would only be using White House, State Department, Pentagon, CIA, or barackobama.com as their source, is that not correct? Correct me where I am wrong, please?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:18, 30 May 2011 (EDT)

::::They would not be sources unless they had direct knowledge, i.e. were invovled in the planning process, is that not correct? Otherwise, they would only be using White House, State Department, Pentagon, CIA, or barackobama.com as their source, is that not correct? Correct me where I am wrong, please?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:18, 30 May 2011 (EDT)