SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 03:43, July 19, 2011
, 03:43, July 19, 2011comments
::Not often. It can happen in some circumstances, but it's not routine.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
::Not often. It can happen in some circumstances, but it's not routine.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::To my mind the only situation where such a block would be acceptable would be a username-related offense, in which case obviously the IP should '''not''' be blocked.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
== Infinite blocks ==
== Infinite blocks ==
Infinite blocks are disfavored, for several reasons, including how some people move from being liberal to conservative -- more often than other liberals admit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:35, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
Infinite blocks are disfavored, for several reasons, including how some people move from being liberal to conservative -- more often than other liberals admit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:35, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:Agreed. Redemption is always a possibility. This should be reflected in the blocking policy - or at [[Conservapedia:New sysop training page]] (which is being worked on [[User:Iduan/guidelinedraft#Blocking|here]])--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)