Changes

Line 39: Line 39:  
:::::How in the world can you claim protestants read their Bibles more than Catholics? That kind of statement requires backup. Nothing else you've said is worth responding to since you can't point to anything supporting the causal relation your implying. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:29, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::How in the world can you claim protestants read their Bibles more than Catholics? That kind of statement requires backup. Nothing else you've said is worth responding to since you can't point to anything supporting the causal relation your implying. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:29, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::Nate, you have shown yourself to be quite impervious to evidence when you choose to be so I didn't expect you to read the link. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:34, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::Nate, you have shown yourself to be quite impervious to evidence when you choose to be so I didn't expect you to read the link. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:34, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
−
:::::::I actually didn't see the link. You're correct that the Barna page says Catholics read the Bible less. Sorry about that. No need to get personal. Sheesh. You seem to assume bad faith of anyone who challenges the falsities you keep stating. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:37, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
+
:::::::I actually didn't see the link. You're correct that the Barna page says Catholics read the Bible less. Sorry about that. No need to get personal. Sheesh. You seem to assume bad faith of anyone who challenges the falsities you keep stating. Nonetheless I've shown the premise of your "essay" to be completely flawed. You should acknowledge that and fix it. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:37, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
446

edits