Changes

→‎Is it possible that...: Superb insight ... and I think the rules of the House are more welcoming to the best of the public than the clubby rules of the Senate.
Line 2: Line 2:     
...those who are elected to the House tend to better represent the [[Best of the Public]]?  Would it be possible to examine the overall backgrounds of House members as opposed to Senate members to ascertain how far their backgrounds are removed from the public?  I suspect we would find that far fewer Senate members tend to have "common man" backgrounds, and thus, that it's easier for them to fall into the limousine liberal mindset.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 11:11, 24 July 2011 (EDT)
 
...those who are elected to the House tend to better represent the [[Best of the Public]]?  Would it be possible to examine the overall backgrounds of House members as opposed to Senate members to ascertain how far their backgrounds are removed from the public?  I suspect we would find that far fewer Senate members tend to have "common man" backgrounds, and thus, that it's easier for them to fall into the limousine liberal mindset.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 11:11, 24 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Superb insight ... and I think the rules of the House are more welcoming to the [[best of the public]] than the clubby rules of the Senate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:59, 24 July 2011 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits