Block, SkipCaptcha
195
edits
Changes
→Extra privileges granted: thanks
== Slight change. ==
== Slight change. ==
I think it would be fair to say I clarified [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_controversy&action=historysubmit&diff=894934&oldid=894584 your edit]. What say you? --[[User:Chouston|Chouston]] 00:24, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
I think it would be fair to say I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_controversy&action=historysubmit&diff=894934&oldid=894584 clarified] your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=894584 edit]. What say you? --[[User:Chouston|Chouston]] 00:24, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
:I don't know that it's a clarification, so much as a slight change of meaning. Some scientific controversy is '''not''' driving advancement, which I left room for in my edit. As it currently stands, the article says that controversy ''necessarily'' drives advancement, which is not necessarily true. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 20:51, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
== Extra privileges granted ==
You've been granted blocking and SkipCatcha privileges. Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:08, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
:Oh. Thanks. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 00:49, 23 August 2011 (EDT)