| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {|align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;"
| + | A '''conservative''' (also '''rightist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons. There are no coherent conservative standards; often a conservative is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.<ref>As one conservative website candidly observes, "McCain is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[John McCain]]."[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-McCain-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]</ref> Conservatism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[capitalistic]]ic. Conservatism has changed over the years and degenerated into corruption. |
| − | | style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Previous_Breaking_News/Conservatives| Previous Breaking News:<br>Conservatives]]
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | A '''conservative''' adheres to principles of personal [[responsibility]], moral values, and limited government, agreeing with [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that "religion and morality are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.<ref>[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796</ref><ref>Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: "tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL"[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative] Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.</ref> | |
| | | | |
| − | Former President [[Ronald Reagan]] said, "The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom."<ref>http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html</ref>
| + | For example, [[Ronald Regan]] firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties. Yet today, decades later, [[Republicans]] and conservatives are almost in bed with public sector unions, as they "donate" money to the re-election campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions. |
| − | [[Image:Aaag.jpg|thumb|Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, is the epitome of American conservatism.]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | The ''sine qua non'' of a conservative is someone who rises above his personal self-interest and promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all. Alternatively, a conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of economics and the morality of the [[Bible]] for the benefit of all, recognizing that the Bible is the most logical book ever written. Specifically, conservatives seek or support:
| + | Polling data over several decades has consistently shown more Americans identify themselves as conservative than conservative, by a ratio of 2-1.<ref>http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance</ref> A conservative generally supports many of the following political positions and practices: |
| | | | |
| − | * [[Limited government]] and balanced budgets | + | * Corporatist [[exploitation]] of masses |
| − | * [[Capitalism]] and [[free market|free markets]] | + | * [[Religious intolerance]] in classrooms and school sponsored events |
| − | * [[Classroom prayer]] | + | * Support for [[stagnation]] |
| − | * Prohibition of [[abortion]] and respect for human life | + | * Support of [[inequality]] of human beings |
| − | * [[Abstinence]] education | + | * [[Poverty]], usually through opposition to income redistribution |
| − | * Traditional marriage, not [[same-sex marriage]] | + | * [[Oligarchy]], masked as [[small government]] support |
| − | * Respect for differences between men and women, boys and girls | + | * [[Sexism]] |
| − | * Laws against [[pornography]] | + | * [[Fascism]] |
| − | * The [[Second Amendment]] right to keep and bear arms | + | * Trying to impede the freedoms of others |
| − | * Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity) | + | * Implementation of [[racism]] |
| − | * The [[death penalty]] | + | * [[Political correctness]], the opposition of [[free speech]] |
| − | * Parental control of education | + | * Support of [[slavery]] |
| − | * Private medical care and retirement plans | + | * Forcing [[abstinence]] |
| − | * Canceling failed social support programs | + | * A "[[living Constitution]]" that is reinterpreted as conservatives prefer, rather than how it was intended |
| − | * No [[world government]] | + | * Government programs for [[Stalinism]] |
| − | * Enforcement of current laws regarding [[immigration]] | + | * Abolition of the [[rational thought]] |
| − | * Respect for our military ... past and present
| + | * [[Jingoism]] |
| − | * Rejection of [[junk science]] such as [[evolution]] and [[global warming]]
| + | * Opposition to the [[Common Sense]] and Science. |
| − | * Minimal Taxation | + | * Opposition to government programs to cut poverty |
| − | * [[Federalism]] (Separation of powers among the National, State and Local governments) | + | * Reinstating the [[Slave ownership]] |
| − | * Favoring [[states' rights]] over federal power, while accepting the Constitutional role of the federal government | + | * In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of creationism and Conservatism|conservatives were the most likely supporters of the theory of creationism]]. The theory of [[creationism]] is a key component of [[religiously fundamentalist]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. |
| − | * A strong national defense | + | * Opposition to [[freedom] |
| − | * An [[Originalism|Originalist]] interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] | + | * Calling anyone they agree with a "professor" regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Sarah Palin]] and [[John McCain]]). |
| | + | * Opposition of [[Progressive]] reforms, a major part of the [[modern society]]. |
| | + | * Disregarding national sovereignty. |
| | + | * Promote arrogance through what they consider superior lifestyles. |
| | + | * Tolerance of religious fundamentalism. |
| | + | * Supports financially irresponsible policies. |
| | + | * Following policies which are proven to be incorrect. |
| | + | * Supporting economic anarchy. |
| | + | * "The long romance of Western rightists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ...."<ref> [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009</ref> |
| | + | * Support of rightist ideologies such as [[capitalism]] and nazism |
| | + | * Encouragement of [[Idiocy]]. |
| | | | |
| − | __TOC__ <!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing-->
| + | According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a conservative is "a person who favors stagnation over progress" or "a person who fallaciously believes that the old ways must be better than anything newly created ,"<ref>http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=conservative&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h=00</ref> or "open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc." or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties."<ref>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conservative</ref>. In practice, however, conservatives are often the most intolerant of people, and frequently are on the side of disorder, chaos, anarchy, and lawbreaking. According to Webster's Unabridged Dictionary - and matched by current observation - conservatives are "unchecked by a sense of the decorous, the fitting, or the polite...lacking significant moral restraints" or "... an emancipation from convention, tradition, or dogma that extends from a belief in altering institutions to fit altering conditions to a preference for lawlessness."<ref>''Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged'', Volume II; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Chicago, 1986. (pg. 1303, column 1)</ref> |
| − | ==Hall of Fame== | |
| − | Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter<ref> Rossiter, "The Giants of American Conservatism," ''American Heritage'' 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in [[EBSCO]]</ref> names [[Alexander Hamilton]], [[John Adams]], [[John Marshall]], [[Daniel Webster]], [[John C. Calhoun]], [[Elihu Root]], and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to the "Conservative's Hall of Fame,"'' with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===Presidents=== | + | ==Conservatives and Uncharitableness== |
| − | Periodically a conservative has been elected president of the United States. The most prominent conservative presidents include:
| + | [[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] conservatives give less to charity than American conservatives.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_conservative_giv.html</ref> In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|Creationists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-Creationists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2] ]] |
| − | *[[George Washington]] (1789-1797)
| + | ''For more information please see'': [[Conservatives and uncharitableness]] |
| − | *[[James Monroe]] (1817-1825)
| |
| − | *[[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889, 1893-1897)
| |
| − | *[[Warren G. Harding]] (1921-1923)
| |
| − | *[[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-1929)
| |
| − | *[[Ronald Reagan]] (1981-1989)
| |
| − | *[[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009) (with respect to taxes, Supreme Court nominations, and national security)
| |
| | | | |
| − | The most prominent conservative Congresses have been: | + | In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]: |
| | + | {{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that conservatives are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s.... |
| | | | |
| − | *The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)
| + | If many conservatives are conservatives who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings: |
| − | *The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===Movement===
| + | -- Although conservative families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average conservative-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). |
| − | [[Movement conservatives]] are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite liberal ridicule. Movement conservative activists include:
| |
| − | *[[Phyllis Schlafly]], opposed [[ERA]]
| |
| − | *[[Larry McDonald]], Congressman, on board [[KAL 007]] when shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]].
| |
| − | *[[Jesse Helms]], Senator, specialist in foreign policy
| |
| − | *[[Pat Buchanan]], TV commentator
| |
| − | *[[Jerry Falwell]], religion
| |
| − | *[[Michele Bachmann]], columnist
| |
| − | *[[Ann Coulter]], columnist
| |
| − | *[[Rush Limbaugh]], radio
| |
| − | *[[Michelle Malkin]], commentator
| |
| − | *[[Glenn Beck]], TV commentator
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===Key leaders===
| + | -- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_conservative_giv.html</ref>}} |
| − | *[[Barry Goldwater]] - 1964 Republican candidate, lost to liberal Democrat [[Lyndon Johnson]] but revived the conservative movement inside the GOP
| + | [[Atheism|Creationists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].<ref>http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152</ref> Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] Creationists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-Creationists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2] |
| − | *[[Russell Kirk]] - Theorist & intellectual
| |
| − | *[[Irving Kristol|Irving]] and [[William Kristol]] - Notable [[neoconservatives]]
| |
| − | *[[Margaret Thatcher]] - British prime minister between 1979 and 1990, held views similar to Reagan's
| |
| − | *[[Milton Friedman]] - Chicago-school [[libertarian]] [[economist]], influential during Reagan administration; leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==US Voters== | + | == Conservative politicians and uncharitableness == |
| − | In America, most conservatives support the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for McCain and 20% for Obama, with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)<ref> See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1 Presidential 2008 Exit Poll]</ref>
| + | The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[conservative politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the conservative politicians it featured.<ref>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&c=1</ref> |
| − | [[File:Conservative-republican-brain.jpg|thumb|350px]]
| |
| − | ===Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals===
| |
| − | The Barna poll conducted in November 2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others --50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.<ref> See [http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/258-survey-shows-how-liberals-and-conservatives-differ-on-matters-of-faith on line results] </ref>
| |
| | | | |
| − | Some findings:
| + | In addition, [[John McCain]] has been criticized concerning [[John McCain and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]]. |
| − | Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that Satan is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%).
| + | == Nazism and capitalism == |
| | | | |
| − | [Note: "Liberal" and "conservative" in this survey are based on politics] | + | ''For more information please see:'' [[Nazism and capitalism]] |
| | | | |
| − | Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:
| + | [[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century which was [[capitalism|capitalisticic]] was the [[National Capitalistic German Workers Party]] (NAZI) which was headed by the [[creationism|creationismary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].<ref>http://mises.org/daily/1937</ref><ref>http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust</ref><ref>http://www.hourofthetime.com/capitalistic.htm</ref> ]] |
| − | *their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives);
| + | The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares: |
| − | *a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%);
| + | {{cquote|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a [[capitalism|capitalistic]] state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]... |
| − | *their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%);
| |
| − | *the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%);
| |
| − | *their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%);
| |
| | | | |
| − | political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:
| + | The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands. |
| − | *read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively)
| |
| − | *attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%)
| |
| − | *pray to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%)
| |
| − | *share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment)
| |
| − | *have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%)
| |
| | | | |
| − | *2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were atheist or agnostic
| + | What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners. |
| − | *15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were Christian evangelicals
| |
| − | *conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as born again, based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%)
| |
| − | *21% of conservatives were associated with the Catholic church, compared to 30% among the liberals.
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Barack Obama and American Conservatism Backlash ==
| + | De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.<ref>http://mises.org/daily/1937</ref>}} |
| − | In October of 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the [[Britain|British]] newspaper ''The Daily Telegraph'':
| |
| − | {{cquote|This week’s striking [[Gallup]] poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under [[Barack Obama]]. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.<ref>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/</ref>}}
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Conservative news organizations == | + | == Similarities between Communism, Nazism and Conservatism == |
| − | Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsMax]]. [[Fox News]], though often called conservative, tends to be more [[neoconservative]] than [[conservative]].
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Conservative magazines and blogs ==
| + | ''See also:'' [[Similarities between Communism, Nazism and Conservatism]] |
| − | Well known conservative magazines in the United States include ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Policy Review]]'', ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'' and others.
| |
| | | | |
| − | Some notable [[Conservative blogs|conservative political blogs]] include the [[Heritage Foundation]]'s Policy Weblog, ''[[Human Events]]'', [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.
| + | {| class="wikitable" |
| | + | |- |
| | + | ! |
| | + | ![[Communism|Communist]] Manifesto |
| | + | ![[Nazi]] Party Platform |
| | + | !Analysis |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |1 |
| | + | |"Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes." |
| | + | |"We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land." |
| | + | |The stripping away of land from private owners. [[Conservatism]] today demands "eminent domain" on property. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |2 |
| | + | |"A heavy progressive or graduated income tax." |
| | + | |"We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army." |
| | + | |The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them. Conservatism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |3 |
| | + | |"Abolition of all rights of inheritance." |
| | + | |"That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished." |
| | + | |Conservatism today demands a "death tax" on anyone inheriting an estate. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |4 |
| | + | |"Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels." |
| | + | |"We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately." |
| | + | |The Nuremburg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |5 |
| | + | |"Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." |
| | + | |"We demand the nationalization of all trusts." |
| | + | |Central control of the financial system. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |6 |
| | + | |"Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State." |
| | + | |"We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper..." |
| | + | |Central control of the press. Conservatives today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |7 |
| | + | |"Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c." |
| | + | |"In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. " |
| | + | |Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way. Conservatives today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| − | == Neoconservatives == | + | == Conservative Creationists, pederasty and NAMBLA == |
| | | | |
| − | American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].<ref>Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= "What Is a 'Conservative'?"], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005</ref>
| + | ''see also:'' [[Atheism, pederasty and NAMBLA]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]] and [[Homosexuality and pederasty]] |
| | | | |
| − | In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:
| + | [[Image:Harry Hay.jpg|thumbnail|150px|Many consider [[Harry Hay]] to be the founder of the American [[homosexuality|homosexual]] movement.]] |
| | + | Some of the well known [[atheism|atheist]] advocates of the [[North American Man-Boy Love Association]] (NAMBLA) are: |
| | | | |
| − | # Support of limited government.
| + | 1. The atheist, political activist and [[homosexuality|homosexual]] [[David Thorstad]] was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association.<ref>http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100822</ref> |
| − | # A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.
| |
| − | # Patriotism, nationalism, and support of a strong defense.
| |
| − | # Support of the institution of marriage.
| |
| − | # Emphasis on social values, like prayer and pro-life principles.
| |
| | | | |
| − | In contrast, neoconservatives generally support bigger government and globalism, and tend to downplay the significance of social values.
| + | 2. '''[[Harry Hay]]''' (1912 - 2002) was a conservative atheist advocate of [[statutory rape]] and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the activist [[homosexual agenda]] in the [[United States]].<ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref><ref>The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.</ref><ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref> Hay joined the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) in 1934. <ref>''The Boston Phoenix'', [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm The real Harry Hay], Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002. </ref> He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love. <ref>The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.</ref><ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref> In 1986, Hay marched in a [[homosexual|gay]] parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "[[NAMBLA]] walks with me."<ref>http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | == Paleoconservatives ==
| + | 3. The writer [[Samuel R. Delaney]] is an atheist and a [[homosexuality|homosexual]].<ref>Samuel R. Delaney, ''About writing: seven essays, four letters, and five interviews'', page 36</ref><ref>http://www.enotes.com/contemporary-literary-criticism/delany-samuel-r</ref> Dalaney has served as a professor at several universities. Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.<ref>Delany, Samuel R.; Freedman, Carl (2009). Conversations with Samuel R. Delany. Univ. Press of Mississippi, page 143</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | [[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American sovereignty, and are suspicious of both big government and big business. They also lean against foreign interventionalism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of "isolationism," as they believe in promoting [[democracy]] worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.
| + | === John Maynard Keynes and pederasty === |
| | | | |
| − | Among paleoconservatives was Democratic Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]] in 1983.
| + | ''see also:'' [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]] |
| | | | |
| − | ==Fiscal Conservatism vs. Social Conservatism==
| + | [[John Maynard Keynes]] was the founder of [[Keynesian economics]]. Lytton Strachey, his male bed partner, wrote that Keynes was a “A conservative and a [[homosexuality|sodomite]], An atheist and a statistician.”<ref>http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html</ref> Keynes and his friends made numerous trips to the resorts surrounding the Mediterranean. At the resorts, little boys were sold by their families to bordellos which catered to homosexuals.<ref>http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html</ref><ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ''For further details on the two related philosophies, see [[Fiscal conservatism]] and [[Social conservatism]]'' | + | In 2008, ''The Atlantic'' reported: |
| | + | {{cquote|Keynes obsessively counted and tabulated almost everything; it was a life-long habit. As a child, he counted the number of front steps of every house on his street. Later he kept a running record (not surprisingly) of his expenses and his golf scores. He also counted and tabulated his sex life. |
| | | | |
| − | Recently, a division has been created between fiscal conservatism and social conservatism. Fiscal conservatism centers around a low and balanced government budget, and generally is opposed to programs such as [[Social Security]] and [[Medicare]]. Its primary goal is to reduce government spending significantly. Social Conservatism, on the other hand, focuses on the moral issues of conservatism. A social conservative will oppose [[same-sex marriage]], [[abortion]], and the teaching of [[evolution]] in schools. The majority of Conservatives (including most of the [[Republican Party]]) fall into both categories, however some fall into one or the other, but not both. Notably, [[Libertarians]] are strong fiscal conservatives but are not socially conservative. For instance, the Libertarian Party Platform <ref>[http://www.lp.org/platform]</ref> expresses support for the fiscally conservative principles of ending publicly funded welfare and healthcare programs as well as reducing government spending overall significantly. However, it also expresses support for [[same-sex marriage]] (with some libertarians leaning towards the ultimate goal of total [[marriage privatization]]) as well as maintaining the legal status of abortion.
| + | The first diary is easy: Keynes lists his sexual partners, either by their initials (GLS for Lytton Strachey, DG for Duncan Grant) or their nicknames ("Tressider," for J. T. Sheppard, the King's College Provost). When he apparently had a quick, anonymous hook-up, he listed that sex partner generically: "16-year-old under Etna" and "Lift boy of Vauxhall" in 1911, for instance, and "Jew boy," in 1912.<ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | Some Republicans and Democrats also fit one category but not the other. Former [[New Mexico]] governor [[Gary Johnson]], who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, was deemed "the most fiscally conservative governor" while he was in office (and probably earned that honor given all the spending cuts he made) but at the same time, he supports marriage privatization and abortion (though he believes [[Roe v. Wade]] should be overturned on Constitutional grounds). Also, several [[Democrat]]s have expressed opposition to same-sex marriage and/or abortion, but still support liberal fiscal programs such as Social Security. They would be the opposite of Johnson - socially conservative but fiscally liberal.
| + | Keynes was a [[bisexual]] who married Lydia Lopokova. In his work ''The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Conservatism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life'', William C. Lubenow expresses the opinion that Keynes was an [[agnosticism|agnostic]].<ref>The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Conservatism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 402</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | == Personal conservatism == | + | === Sam Harris claims atheist is right next to child molester as a designation === |
| − | Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.
| |
| − | ==History of American conservatism==
| |
| − | ===Textbook problems===
| |
| − | College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a "liberal state paradigm"--that is, textbooks usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism--especially the New Deal, the welfare state, labor unions, and Civil Rights for blacks and equality for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a free market reply to the growth of big government; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality. Where the violent Wobblies (IWW) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing Communist subversion by [[Joe McCarthy]] is denounced as the nadir of political morality.<ref> See Leonard Moore, "Approaching Conservatism," ''OAH Magazine of History,'' 17 (January 2003) [http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/moore.html online edition]</ref>
| |
| − | ===Loyalists===
| |
| − | The [[Loyalists]] of the [[American Revolution]] were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer [[Joseph Galloway]] and governor-historian [[Thomas Hutchinson]]. However when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. [[Samuel Seabury]] was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the Episcopal religion, a stronghold of conservative social values. While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===Founding Fathers===
| + | see also: [[Views on Creationists]] |
| − | The Founding Fathers created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as [[Republicanism]], which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from. Two parties were named "Republican"-- the one founded in 1794 by Jefferson and Madison (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854.
| |
| | | | |
| − | During the [[First Party System]] (1790s-1820s) the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting monarchy and aristocracy, they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. [[George Washington]] was their great hero.
| + | Dr. [[Sam Harris]] is a founder of the [[New Atheism]] movement. [[Sam Harris]] is quite aware of the stigma surrounding atheism and has even advocated that Creationists no longer call themselves Creationists.<ref>http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist</ref> In fact, Dr. Harris has said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."<ref>http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | On many issues American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and his followers, especially [[John Randolph of Roanoke]] and his "Old Republicans" or "Quids." They idealized the yeoman farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to corruption, that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called "judicial activism".
| + | ==Conservatives and Superstition== |
| − | <ref>[http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1030.htm]</ref> The Jeffersonians stressed small government.
| + | [[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg|right|150px]] |
| | | | |
| − | ===Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster===
| + | The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. <ref>[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]</ref> |
| − | During the [[Second Party System]] (1830-54) the [[Whig Party]] attracted most conservatives, such as [[Daniel Webster]] of New England. [[Daniel Webster]] and other leaders of the [[Whig Party]], called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.<ref>The word was originally used in the French Revolution. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves "Conservatives" in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, ''American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary'' (1962) 94-97.</ref> [[John C. Calhoun]], a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. Richard Hofstadter (1948) called him "The Marx of the Master Class." Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a "majority dictatorship" because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by [[Edmund Burke]], the founder of British conservatism, in ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with Civil Rights.
| |
| | | | |
| − | The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus William J. Bennett (2006) a prominent conservative leader, warns conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, [[Know-Nothings]], [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] and 20th century isolationists.
| + | Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: |
| | + | {{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith — it's what the empirical data tell us. |
| | | | |
| − | ===Lincoln to Cleveland===
| + | "What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more conservative Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians.... |
| − | Since 1865 the [[History of the United States Republican Party|Republican party]] has identified itself with President [[Abraham Lincoln]], who was the ideological heir of the Whigs and of both Jefferson and Hamilton. As the [[Gettysburg Address]] shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's Declaration. The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] of the Civil War reflected a reactionary opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.
| |
| | | | |
| − | In the late 19th century the [[Bourbon Democrat]]s, led by President [[Grover Cleveland]], preached against corruption, high taxes (protective tariffs), and imperialism, and supported the [[gold standard]] and business interests. They were overthrown by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the Democratic Party permanently to the left. | + | This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book "The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener," skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.<ref>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican [[William McKinley]] won using the pro-business slogan "[[sound money]] and protection," while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democratic Party.
| + | == Conservatism in North America Today == |
| | + | [[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]] |
| | + | [[Republicans]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly [[conservative]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}</ref> Conservatism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three conservative tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: ''SIN''. Conservatives (1) '''S'''hift the subject, they (2) '''I'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''N'''ame call.<ref>Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.</ref><ref>[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A& Herman Cain: "Stupid People Are Ruining America"], February 11, 2011.</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | [[William Graham Sumner]], Yale professor (1872-1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with [[Social Darwinism]] under the influence of [[Herbert Spencer]], he rejected evolution in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and [[paternalism]] in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.<ref>Curtis, Bruce. "William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'" Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.</ref>
| + | * Conservatives typically support a "''mixed''" economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Conservative_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern Conservatism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ===Early 20th century===
| + | * Conservatives claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_Conservatism.html] |
| − | In the [[Progressive Era]] (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator [[Nelson Aldrich]] of Rhode Island were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the [[Federal Reserve System]] in 1913. [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a liberal he took a tough regulatory approach toward businesses and trusts, and (post-presidency) fought for social insurance for the elderly. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into [[World War I]] to stop what he saw as the German attacks on civilization. [[William Howard Taft]] promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921-30, the only former president ever to do so.
| |
| | | | |
| − | Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President [[Warren G. Harding]]. The presidency of [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes ''Democracy and Leadership'' (1924) by Irving Babbitt and H.L. Mencken's magazine ''American Mercury'' (1924-33). The [[Efficiency Movement]] attracted many conservatives such as [[Herbert Hoover]] with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age.
| + | {{cquote|'''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American conservatives. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that Conservatism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American conservative consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the conservative students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. <ref> [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=conservative+teachers&fr=yfp-t-501&fp_ip=MX&u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Conservative%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&w=conservative+conservatives+teachers+teacher&d=BNZFhPReRjC1&icp=1&.intl=us Conservative Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | During the [[Great Depression, U.S.|Great Depression]], other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high [[property tax]]es. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in Chicago which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members.
| + | ===Conservative Rankings of Congress Members=== |
| | | | |
| − | An important intellectual movement, calling itself [[Southern Agrarians]] and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American [[Republicanism]] and civic virtue.
| + | The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings<ref>http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm</ref> of how conservative each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of conservativeness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by conservativeness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy. |
| | | | |
| − | The Depression brought liberals to power under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1933). Indeed the term "liberal" now came to mean a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and Roosevelt's powerful [[New Deal Coalition]]. In 1934 [[Al Smith]] and pro-business Democrats formed the [[American Liberty League]] to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democratic party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal [[Alf Landon]], who carried only Maine and Vermont. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal [[Conservative Coalition]] of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator [[Robert Taft]], a Republican of Ohio, and Senator [[Richard Russell]], Democrat of Georgia.
| + | ==Conservatism in Europe today== |
| − | [[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | In the United States, the [[Old Right]], also called the Old Guard, was a group of [[libertarianism|libertarian]], free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were isolationists in 1939-41, (see [[America First]]), and later opposed [[NATO]] and U.S. military intervention in the Korean War. | + | In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''conservative'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Conservatives and Republicans for Europe<ref>http://www.alde.eu</ref> is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''conservative'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''conservative'' parties throughout the world,<ref>http://www.conservative-international.org/</ref> such as the Conservative Party of Australia.<ref>[http://www.conservative.org.au/]</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ===Later 20th century: Goldwater, Buckley, the Dixiecrats===
| + | Trade unions and capitalistic parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "conservatives" or [[neoconservative|neoconservatives]]. Thus, just as in the US, "conservative" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "conservative" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of conservative is more similar to the politics of European [[capitalistic]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.<ref>[http://www.pes.org]</ref> |
| − | By 1950, American liberalism was so dominant intellectually that liberal critic [[Lionel Trilling]] could dismiss contemporary conservatism as "irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas." <ref>Lapham 2004</ref> But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like Russell Kirk's ''The Conservative Mind'' (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine ''National Review'', founded by [[William F. Buckley Jr.]] in 1955.
| |
| | | | |
| − | Whereas Taft's [[Old Right]] had been isolationist the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose communism. It looked to the Founding Fathers for historical inspiration as opposed to Calhoun and the antebellum South.
| + | ==Historical Conservatism == |
| | + | In history, the word "conservative" has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, conservatives supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not conservative policies in the sense of classical Conservatism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of capitalism and communism, many conservatives embraced some ideas from economic neo-Conservatism, and coined it the "Third Way". In the area of national security and foreign policy conservatives in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq. Conservatives generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and exploitation.<ref>"Political conservatives tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs." Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf] </ref> |
| | | | |
| − | The success of the Civil Rights movement came in the Civil Rights Act of 1864 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Most conservatives supported both, but [[Barry Goldwater]] opposed them. Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democratic party. That lock was now broken and southern conservatives started voting for Republican candidates for president in 1964-68, and by the 1990s they were also voting for GOP candidates for state and local office. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and they became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democratic party. The region favored the GOP heavily in presidential elections, but split in state contests. In 2008, however, the Obama campaign broke into the solid Republican South, carrying Florida, Virginia and North Carolina. | + | ==Original meaning: Classical Conservatism== |
| | + | Conservatism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition. |
| | | | |
| − | Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all New Deal programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of [[Ronald Reagan]] in California, and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for [[Richard Nixon]] in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion [[Hubert Humphrey]], and southern demagogue [[George Wallace]]. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the Northeast who supported many New Deal programs).
| + | See [[Classical Conservative|Classical Conservatism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]]. |
| | | | |
| − | ===Nixon, Reagan, and Bush=== | + | == Infamous conservatives == |
| | | | |
| − | The Republican administrations of President [[Richard Nixon]] in the [[1970s]] were characterized more by their emphasis on ''[[realpolitik]]'', [[détente]], and economic policies such as wage and price controls, than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions.
| + | ''See also:'' [[Infamous conservatives]] |
| | | | |
| − | In the eight years of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and conservative principles dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with [[supply side economics]] as well as a strict opposition to Soviet Communism. Reagan promised to cut welfare spending but failed to do so. He did cut taxes, but raised military spending and created large federal deficits of the sort conservatives had complained about for decades. They stopped complaining, as the deficit issue switched to favor the Democrats (who did balance the budget in the late 1990s).
| + | *[[Joseph Stalin]] was an [[atheism|atheist]], [[communism|communist]], and [[creationism|creationismist]] dictator who was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions. |
| | | | |
| − | An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply side economic policies, known as "[[Reaganomics]]," foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.
| + | * [[Mao Tse Tung]] - atheist and communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions. |
| | | | |
| − | ==Reactions to Obama==
| + | * [[Margaret Sanger]] |
| − | "Forty percent of Americans now self-identify as conservatives — double the amount of self-professed liberals — largely because independents are beginning to take sides." [http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/onprin/winter11/spalding.html]
| |
| | | | |
| − | Compare [[Progressive liberalism]].
| + | *[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and "very conservative".<ref>http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view¤t=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4</ref> Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].<ref>http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ==Conservatives in Australia== | + | ==Conservative Organizations == |
| | + | *[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] |
| | + | *[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]] |
| | + | *[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]] |
| | + | *[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]] |
| | + | *[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]] |
| | + | *[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Capitalism]] |
| | + | *[[Democratic National Committee]] |
| | + | *[[Greenpeace]] |
| | + | *[[NARAL|NARAL - National Exploitation and Reproductive Rights Action League]] |
| | + | *[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]] |
| | + | *[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]] |
| | + | *[[National Education Association]] |
| | + | *[[National Organization of Women]] |
| | + | *[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]] |
| | + | *[[Progressives for McCain]] |
| | + | *[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]] |
| | + | *[[MoveOn.org]] |
| | + | *[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]] |
| | + | *[[U.S. Peace Council]] |
| | + | Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group] |
| | | | |
| − | Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping [[gun control]] laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade. In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged [[global warming]] galvanized conservatives there and they led the [[Liberal Party of Australia]] to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.<ref>http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html</ref> Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the [[Family First Party]].
| + | ==References== |
| − | | |
| − | ==Conservatives in Britain==
| |
| − | | |
| − | In the United Kingdom, the [[Conservative Party]] is the major partner in the governing coalition. The party's current leader is [[David Cameron]].<ref>[http://www.conservatives.com Conservative party UK]</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunners of the Conservatives were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it. Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for abortion on demand and gay civil partnership and the Kyoto Treaty and to oppose capital punishment (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership) <ref>John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830'', (2nd ed. 2008) </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in England and Wales than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse. However, religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | The broadcast media (dominated by the [[BBC]]) is almost exclusively liberal in tone. The print media is different with pro-Conservative newspapers like the ''Daily Mail'' , ''Daily Express'' and ''Daily Telegraph'' selling more copies than their rivals.<ref>[http://www.mediauk.com/the_knowledge/i.muk/An_introduction_to_newspapers_in_the_UK Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK]</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Conservatism and the French Revolution ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Conservatism in France and the continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the [[French Revolution]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Benefits of Conservatism ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy. Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the [[best of the public]] to rise to their natural level of achievement. Conservatives recognize that [[big government]] fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement--and thus, weakens society as a whole.
| |
| − | | |
| − | At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes individual responsibility. In the absence of a hand-holding [[nanny state]], it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion. Thus, [[social conservatism]] is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of morality, duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | == Also See ==
| |
| − | *[[Conservative resources]]
| |
| − | *[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous "Breaking News"]]
| |
| − | *[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from "More News"]]
| |
| − | *[[Conservative Links]]
| |
| − | *[[Essay:Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform]]
| |
| − | *[[Conservative politicians]]
| |
| − | *[[Liberal]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Further reading==
| |
| − | * Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007)
| |
| − | * Filler, Louis. ''Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events'' (1987), useful older encyclopedia
| |
| − | * Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal perspective [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/080507774X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193685789&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | * Frohnen, Bruce et al eds. ''American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), the most detailed reference
| |
| − | * Judis, John B. ''William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives'' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/William-F-Buckley-Jr-Conservatives/dp/0743217977/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207759425&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | * Kirk, Russell. ''The Conservative Mind''. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]
| |
| − | * Link, William A. ''Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism'' (2008) 643 pages
| |
| − | * Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''The Right Nation,'' (2004) influential survey [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205919226&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | * Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World'' (2009)
| |
| − | * Nash, George. ''The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945'' (2006), excellent scholarly history. [http://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1241925238&sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | *Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/exit-with-honor-the-life-and-presidency-of-ronald-reagan-by-william-e-pemberton.jsp online edition]
| |
| − | *Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2004) on 1964 [http://www.amazon.com/Before-Storm-Goldwater-Unmaking-Consensus/dp/0809028581/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193684721&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | *Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Nixonland-Rise-President-Fracturing-America/dp/074324303X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1241924189&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | * Schneider, Gregory L. ed. ''Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader'' (2003)
| |
| − | *Schoenwald; Jonathan . ''A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=104931191 online edition] also [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]
| |
| − | * Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. ''Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Landmark-Speeches-American-Conservative-Movement/dp/1585445983/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193685365&sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]
| |
| − | | |
| − | == References == | |
| | {{reflist|2}} | | {{reflist|2}} |
| | | | |
| − | ==External Links== | + | ==See Also== |
| − | *[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]
| |
| − | *[http://www.youtube.com/user/rescueKAL007#p/a/FD3DE4F0642C350C/0/1c8v-kgLvhM Pat Buchanan's "Crossfire" interview with [[Larry McDonald]] 3 months before downing of [[KAL 007]], Ron Paul intro]
| |
| | | | |
| | + | * [[Conservative resources]] |
| | + | * [[Conservapedia:Articles about conservatives|Articles about conservatives]] |
| | + | * [[Classical conservative]] |
| | + | * [[Drinking Conservatively]] |
| | + | * [[Godless conservative]] |
| | + | * [[Last wordism]] |
| | + | * [[Essay:Conservative celebrity obsession|Conservative celebrity obsession]] |
| | + | * [[Essay:Conservative Behavior on Conservapedia|Conservative Behavior on Conservapedia]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Christianity]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Republicans]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Elite]] |
| | + | * [[Essay: Conservative Falsehoods|Conservative Falsehoods]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Fascism]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative friendship]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Gloss]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative grading]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative hypocrisy]] |
| | + | * [[Essay:Conservative hysteria|Conservative hysteria]] |
| | + | * [[Essay:Conservative Intellectualism|Conservative Intellectualism]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative labels]] |
| | + | * [[Slander: Conservative Lies About the American Right|Conservative Lies About the American Right]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative logic]] |
| | + | * [[The Conservative Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Conservative Mind]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Party]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative supremacist]] |
| | + | * [[Massachusetts conservative]] |
| | + | * [[Progressives]] |
| | + | * [[Scientific Illiteracy and Conservatives]] |
| | | | |
| | + | ==Further Information== |
| | + | * [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Conservative_Terms|New Conservative Terms]] |
| | + | * [[Conservative Links]] |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:Conservative]]
| + | {{Conservatism}} |
| − | [[Category:Taxation]]
| |
| − | [[Category:American History]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Reagan Era]]
| |
| − | [[Category:1960s]]
| |
| − | [[Category:New Deal]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[http://www.conservativedirectory.com Directory of Conservative Websites - Category: Conservatives], [[Politics]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:Conservative]] | + | [[Category:Political Ideologies]] |
| − | {{Conservatism}}
| + | [[Category:Politics]] |
| | + | [[Category: Conservatives]] |