Changes

170 bytes added ,  00:56, August 2, 2011
Line 8: Line 8:  
Shouldn't we combine this article with the [[Constantinople]] article?  --[[User:JarradD|JarradD]] 20:13, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Shouldn't we combine this article with the [[Constantinople]] article?  --[[User:JarradD|JarradD]] 20:13, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:Upon reflection, perhaps I should have put the notice on the [[Constantinople]] article so that we retain the article in the current city name.  IN any case are there any dissenters?  --[[User:JarradD|JarradD]] 20:23, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:Upon reflection, perhaps I should have put the notice on the [[Constantinople]] article so that we retain the article in the current city name.  IN any case are there any dissenters?  --[[User:JarradD|JarradD]] 20:23, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
::Considering the size, I'd have no problem with it as long as Constantinople gets made into a history section for this --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:56, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
966

edits