8
edits
Changes
Talk:Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? (view source)
Revision as of 12:18, August 4, 2011
, 12:18, August 4, 2011no edit summary
If you don't take this part of the bible literally, how can you take the rest?
If you don't take this part of the bible literally, how can you take the rest?
I believe that scripture should be backed up by scripture. Fortunately, all scripture is backed up in one text: "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for 3instruction in righteousness," Titus 3:16. If you actually believe any of the Bible to be true, then you must believe that it is given ''by inspiration of God'' and is therefore '''infallible'''.
I believe that scripture should be backed up by scripture. Fortunately, all scripture is backed up in one text: "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness," Titus 3:16. If you actually believe any of the Bible to be true, then you must believe that it is given ''by inspiration of God'' and is therefore '''infallible'''.