Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
expanded, with reference
Line 5: Line 5:  
#It does not take into account the advantages that supposedly poor designs offer, such as those afflicted with sickle cell anemia having immunity from malaria.
 
#It does not take into account the advantages that supposedly poor designs offer, such as those afflicted with sickle cell anemia having immunity from malaria.
 
#Even if a poor design were shown, it would not counter the other aspects of creation that are unarguably the result of good design; since an absolute rule can be disproved by a single counterexample, a single showing of a biological feature that is unarguably designed and designed well suffices to disprove the argument from poor design.
 
#Even if a poor design were shown, it would not counter the other aspects of creation that are unarguably the result of good design; since an absolute rule can be disproved by a single counterexample, a single showing of a biological feature that is unarguably designed and designed well suffices to disprove the argument from poor design.
#What appears to be poor design could actually be a result of the [[Fall of Man]].
+
#What appears to be poor design could actually be a result of the [[Fall of Man]]. As [[CreationWiki]] notes, such "flaws" are actually "a result of deterioration, resulting from Man's Fall."<ref>[http://creationwiki.org/Functional_integration_indicates_design_(Talk.Origins) Functional integration indicates design], from [[CreationWiki]]</ref>
 
#God did not design organisms to be perfect. To do so would be to create an equal of Himself.  
 
#God did not design organisms to be perfect. To do so would be to create an equal of Himself.  
 
+
==References==
 +
<references/>
 
[[Category:Creationism]]
 
[[Category:Creationism]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]
 
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu