Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
574
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 153:
Line 153: − − == Why did you block me? == − − What are you talking about, sockpuppets?? I made an edit that JamesWilson agreed I could make, DouglasA BLOCKED ME FOR VANDALISM and I made another account to ask James to sort it out. Have none of you guys ever heard of DISCUSSION? Your article is WRONG and I'm trying to make it better! Go look at what I wrote on James' talk page, would you? Or does nobody care? Are only the elite allowed to ever edit anything here? I'm new to Conservapedia and if some of you don't stop being such d**ks I'm not gonna be staying around. Elisa. --[[User:BibleScienceChick|BibleScienceChick]] 10:52, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
→Why did you block me?
Hi there. I'd really like to improve this article because I think it's important, but not very good just now. A lot of the arguments it makes are based on old information or a misunderstanding of what evolutionists are saying. I've had a lot of debates with evolutionists and they just love being able to accuse us of using strawman arguments, and unfortunately there are a lot of them here. I think we should cut out a lot of the silly stuff and focus on promising areas like irreducible complexity. How does that sound? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 09:15, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
Hi there. I'd really like to improve this article because I think it's important, but not very good just now. A lot of the arguments it makes are based on old information or a misunderstanding of what evolutionists are saying. I've had a lot of debates with evolutionists and they just love being able to accuse us of using strawman arguments, and unfortunately there are a lot of them here. I think we should cut out a lot of the silly stuff and focus on promising areas like irreducible complexity. How does that sound? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 09:15, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
:Two suggestions: one, bring these points up on the talk page and see what other editors think about them; two, if you think a significant rewrite of the article is required, work on your own version in your userspace and ask for the input of major contributors to the existing article. Either way, to get any changes made you'll have to marshall your arguments to convince the other editors here that your changes are for the better. Making major changes unilaterally isn't going to help with that. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 09:20, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
:Two suggestions: one, bring these points up on the talk page and see what other editors think about them; two, if you think a significant rewrite of the article is required, work on your own version in your userspace and ask for the input of major contributors to the existing article. Either way, to get any changes made you'll have to marshall your arguments to convince the other editors here that your changes are for the better. Making major changes unilaterally isn't going to help with that. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 09:20, 16 August 2011 (EDT)