SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Debate: What is sufficient proof that Obama is a Muslim? (view source)
Revision as of 05:55, August 23, 2011
, 05:55, August 23, 2011no edit summary
This is a conservative encyclopedia. Its job is to decry liberals and their ideas at every turn. By promulgating the idea that Obama may be a Muslim we are being good conservatives, because it helps to turn people off him. [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 10:16, 11 December 2008 (EST)
This is a conservative encyclopedia. Its job is to decry liberals and their ideas at every turn. By promulgating the idea that Obama may be a Muslim we are being good conservatives, because it helps to turn people off him. [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 10:16, 11 December 2008 (EST)
:[Written under the interpretation of spreading it regardless of its truth.] But not good Christians, and certainly not good people. I think nearly everyone would agree that spreading a rumour you believe to be false is nasty and will cause people to lose trust in you if they discover you believe it to be false. Also, lies should never be necessary to turn people off someone if they worth decrying. - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 01:55, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
'''See also''': [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?]]
'''See also''': [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]