:::::::::::::I'm sure many liberals would disagree with me, that just makes me more assured in my position. However I prayed for a moment and actually came up with a compromise that would work for both of us. How about we have one article called [[American heroism]] and have two sections one called "Heroes" and one called "Heroines" it isn't how I would do it if I was in charge, but compromise is ok as long as it isn't your core principles. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 23:50, 29 August 2011 (EDT) | :::::::::::::I'm sure many liberals would disagree with me, that just makes me more assured in my position. However I prayed for a moment and actually came up with a compromise that would work for both of us. How about we have one article called [[American heroism]] and have two sections one called "Heroes" and one called "Heroines" it isn't how I would do it if I was in charge, but compromise is ok as long as it isn't your core principles. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 23:50, 29 August 2011 (EDT) |