Changes

m
Line 69: Line 69:  
Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space?  
 
Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space?  
   −
Isn't it something to wonder about? Not to mention the simple calculation of observed cosmological redshift and its acceleration. Isn't it a proof telling that the Big Bang is a fake?<ref>And we remember that ascience works only through rejection of false clames of various cranks. Didn't Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler the authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'', that started the [[Big Bang]] craze, turned out to be such cranks despite their mathematical sophistication? Which only proved that math is not science, which we knew anyway.</ref>
+
Isn't it something to wonder about? Not to mention the simple calculation of observed cosmological redshift and its acceleration. Isn't it a proof telling that the Big Bang is a fake?<ref>And we remember that science works only through rejection of false clames of various cranks. Didn't Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler the authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'', that started the [[Big Bang]] craze, turned out to be such cranks despite their mathematical sophistication? Which only proved that math is not science, which we knew anyway.</ref>
    
===And what happened to gravitational energy?===
 
===And what happened to gravitational energy?===
SkipCaptcha
708

edits