SkipCaptcha
708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Problems in Cosmology (view source)
Revision as of 20:02, September 5, 2011
, 20:02, September 5, 2011no edit summary
Do you need the sarcasm re: cranks? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 1 September 2011 (EDT)
Do you need the sarcasm re: cranks? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 1 September 2011 (EDT)
:Hi Ed, I don't think about it as sarcasm but as a definition of an amateur (like myself) who makes a real disovery as opposed to a professional scientists who knows a lot but part of it wrong.
:It is presently with relativity theory that is misunderstood by professional scientists. It has been proven that the universe is not expanding but professionals don't know it yet, for the lack of publication of proof of lack of expansion. They still think that the expansion of universe is real.
:Expansion of universe was proven to be an illusion. So how wouldl you call people like myself who predited it using just standard physics before yet [[relativists]] payed attention to it (which might still take some time until they notice it themselves)? [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 16:02, 5 September 2011 (EDT)