Changes

:::::::Rudrick, by the way, as far as response to Question #1 nothing happens "by chance".  The probability/chance of a coin coming up heads is 50%, but probability/chance does not make it come up heads. Chance/probability is just descriptive, but it is not a causal agent. Please read [http://books.google.com/books?id=OXoefj6r-_0C&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=chance+cover+for+ignorance+quote+sproule&source=bl&ots=GtwbYTbfLt&sig=BbLC1HwH1ohYinXnauDLyCUpMOU&hl=en&ei=SRNzTuPAErDH0AGX-ZS1DQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false this]. Lastly, I am a Protestant and obviously being a Protestant, I believe the Roman Catholic Church has made many errors. For example, the Galileo incident. I sadly have to make the confession that I am still not impressed with your response to Question #1 and I still feel little compulsion to read your responses to the rest of the questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:16, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

:::::::Rudrick, by the way, as far as response to Question #1 nothing happens "by chance".  The probability/chance of a coin coming up heads is 50%, but probability/chance does not make it come up heads. Chance/probability is just descriptive, but it is not a causal agent. Please read [http://books.google.com/books?id=OXoefj6r-_0C&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=chance+cover+for+ignorance+quote+sproule&source=bl&ots=GtwbYTbfLt&sig=BbLC1HwH1ohYinXnauDLyCUpMOU&hl=en&ei=SRNzTuPAErDH0AGX-ZS1DQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false this]. Lastly, I am a Protestant and obviously being a Protestant, I believe the Roman Catholic Church has made many errors. For example, the Galileo incident. I sadly have to make the confession that I am still not impressed with your response to Question #1 and I still feel little compulsion to read your responses to the rest of the questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:16, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

:::::::::Conservative, if you are so confident in your own arguments, I suggest you read all of mine; that is, unless you're afraid it might challenge your own dogmatic beliefs... --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 22:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

:::::::::Conservative, if you are so confident in your own arguments, I suggest you read all of mine; that is, unless you're afraid it might challenge your own dogmatic beliefs... --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 22:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

::Rudrick, judging by your response to question #1 and my rebuttals, I don't believe you are making arguments. I would prefer to spend my time addressing bona fide arguments. For example as far as my rebuttals, and I am just giving one example, you have yet to show anything happens "by chance".  Jesus said, "He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much. (Luke 16:10).  If you have shown yourself unfaithful in your response to question #1 and my rebuttals of your response to question #1, then why should I assume your "responses" to questions 2 through 15 are any better? At least thus far, you are showing yourself to be stubborn and proud person who is not amenable to correction.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

::Rudrick, judging by your response to question #1 and my rebuttals, I don't believe you are making arguments. I would prefer to spend my time addressing bona fide arguments. For example as far as my rebuttals, and I am just giving one example, you have yet to show anything happens "by chance" nor are you admitting error on this point.  Jesus said, "He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much. (Luke 16:10).  If you have shown yourself unfaithful in your response to question #1 and my rebuttals of your response to question #1, then why should I assume your "responses" to questions 2 through 15 are any better? At least thus far, you are showing yourself to be stubborn and proud person who is not amenable to correction.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

== [[Origin of life]] is part of the evolutionary paradigm ==

== [[Origin of life]] is part of the evolutionary paradigm ==