Changes

::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

ARamis,  I do understand that atheists/liberals have a penchant for armchair internet psychology,  but I do think you would would be better off addressing the content of the satire. Although there is some good work being done in cognitive psychology and other branches of psychology (cognitive psychologist help designing products, etc.), it certainly can be argued that counseling psychology suffers from a lack of effectiveness in many cases. And of course, armchair internet psychology is probably even more inane.  

ARamis,  I do understand that atheists/liberals have a penchant for armchair internet psychology (which I think is rather humorous given the issue of [[Atheism and mental health]]),  but I do think you would would be better off addressing the content of the satire. Although there is some good work being done in cognitive psychology and other branches of psychology (cognitive psychologist help designing products, etc.), it certainly can be argued that counseling psychology suffers from a lack of effectiveness in many cases. And of course, armchair internet psychology is probably even more inane.  

Christian author Todd A. Sinelli wrote in an article entitled ''To Whom Shall We Go?'':

Christian author Todd A. Sinelli wrote in an article entitled ''To Whom Shall We Go?'':

.

.

==References==

==References==

<references />

<references />