56
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 28:
Line 28: +
Talk:Liberalism and bestiality (view source)
Revision as of 14:00, October 8, 2011
, 14:00, October 8, 2011→Ok...
:::::::You included links to other articles that have no relevance. So Mr. Singer holds these particular views. Ok, does that mean all such people hold these views? Can you prove that all such people hold these views? Can you identify a pattern beyond your own ideas about what Princeton sees as Mr. Singer's views? If not, you are committing a guilt by association fallacy. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 09:04, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
:::::::You included links to other articles that have no relevance. So Mr. Singer holds these particular views. Ok, does that mean all such people hold these views? Can you prove that all such people hold these views? Can you identify a pattern beyond your own ideas about what Princeton sees as Mr. Singer's views? If not, you are committing a guilt by association fallacy. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 09:04, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
::::Please explain for each internal link why it has no relevance. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:31, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
::::Please explain for each internal link why it has no relevance. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:31, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
:::::Ok...he defends abortion, do all pro-abortionist people defend this position? If not, then why does it matter? The same for euthanasia. As for infanticide, saying he is for it is a little misleading IMO, he merely states that babies are incapable of rational thought and autonomy, I don't think he actually advocates killing them. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 10:00, 8 October 2011 (EDT)