Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: +
Talk:Bestiality and Britain (view source)
Revision as of 20:12, October 8, 2011
, 20:12, October 8, 2011→This page should be deleted...
There is no evidence whatsoever. Whom is the British study referring to? I would guess since the article is about Sweden it is referring to Swedes, but since the distinction isn't made, you can't know whom the study is referring to. In light of this, there is no link b/w Brits and bestiality presented. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 12:14, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
There is no evidence whatsoever. Whom is the British study referring to? I would guess since the article is about Sweden it is referring to Swedes, but since the distinction isn't made, you can't know whom the study is referring to. In light of this, there is no link b/w Brits and bestiality presented. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 12:14, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
:::The UK has an incredibly high dog ownership per capita compared to the rest of the world and dog ownership is also a big deal online for UK people too (I think only the USA has a higher percentage of dog ownership).[http://www.dogwalkersmelbourne.com.au/articles-dog-walking-pet-sitting/54-global-real-world-dog-ownership-versus-online-dog-searches-4.html][http://petshops.about.com/od/PetStoreOperations/a/World-Pet-Market-Trends.htm] Why would a British vet study incur the added expense of studying dogs/cats outside their country when they probably have the second highest dog/cat ownership in the world? Please show me a bunch of British dog/cat vet studies where they did the studies outside their country rather than the UK and then please compare the amount of studies with the overall amount of British studies done inside their country for dogs/cats. I don't think you are using common sense which is a common atheist trait seeing as you deny the existence of God despite the [[Christian apologetics|huge amount of evidence for his existence.]] (which is why Richard Dawkins is afraid to debate William Lane Craig) (see: [[Atheism and cowardice]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:12, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
== Probably should be mentioned in article ==
== Probably should be mentioned in article ==