Changes

714 bytes added ,  02:57, April 8, 2007
Line 62: Line 62:     
Rob, do I detect some note of disapproval at political appointees being removed from "at the pleasure of" appointments? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:51, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Rob, do I detect some note of disapproval at political appointees being removed from "at the pleasure of" appointments? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:51, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Iglesia, the guy removed in New Mexico is a real scream.  A week after he's removed, the new appointee indicts a former Democratic mayor and the former 30 year Democratic State Senate Majority Leader for embezzeling $4 million during constuction of a new Courthouse (see the irony there--even building a Courthouse is a corrupt enterprise in New Mexico).  And of course $40,000 of the stolen cash ended up in Bill Richardson's campaign chest.  Now considering the Courthouse has been in use now for nearly 5 years, how did this all manage to evade news headlines unitl the day after the US Attroney was removed?  This one will be interesting to follow in Washington.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:57, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,524

edits