Changes

:::::::You're not listening, are you? Conversion of mass into energy, in accordance with e=mc² is how nuclear reactors work. Your counterexample was removed because it's INVALID. What part of this don't you understand? Newton's Second Law is irrelevant to the point you're trying to make, by the way.  

:::::::You're not listening, are you? Conversion of mass into energy, in accordance with e=mc² is how nuclear reactors work. Your counterexample was removed because it's INVALID. What part of this don't you understand? Newton's Second Law is irrelevant to the point you're trying to make, by the way.  

:::::::"Yet if they are true, then nuclear power stations can't exist" Epic fail. Nuclear power stations DO exist. --[[User:ClearView2011|ClearView2011]] 13:46, 3 December 2011 (EST)

:::::::"Yet if they are true, then nuclear power stations can't exist" Epic fail. Nuclear power stations DO exist.

 

:::::::"If what you say is true, then we would have to get rid of this entire page because it invalidates every counter example" Why? Just because a theory is false overall, that doesn't mean that parts of it aren't true. Parts of Darwin's tehory are true; living things DO inherit characteristics from their parents and those characteristics DO affect their chances of survival. Despite that, evolution is still false. --[[User:ClearView2011|ClearView2011]] 13:48, 3 December 2011 (EST)