3
edits
Changes
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 00:42, December 10, 2011
, 00:42, December 10, 2011→Federated POV encyclopedias
The concept of Conservapedia and it's tagline as "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" is somewhat incorrect. The collation of articles with a specific bias (in this case, those falling to th (far) right of the Political spectrum) does not an accurate encyclopedia make. The whole objective of an encyclopedia is to present unbiased as possible information on everything pertaining to a subject (such as a Medical or Economics Encyclopedia) or that of a book-Encyclopedia, like you'd find in your nearest library.{{unsigned|Comradejrew}}
The concept of Conservapedia and it's tagline as "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" is somewhat incorrect. The collation of articles with a specific bias (in this case, those falling to th (far) right of the Political spectrum) does not an accurate encyclopedia make. The whole objective of an encyclopedia is to present unbiased as possible information on everything pertaining to a subject (such as a Medical or Economics Encyclopedia) or that of a book-Encyclopedia, like you'd find in your nearest library.{{unsigned|Comradejrew}}
:That's assuming you place any credence in the [[Political spectrum theory]], which is only a theory, and like all theories, are just only theories. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:07, 30 May 2011 (EDT)
:That's assuming you place any credence in the [[Political spectrum theory]], which is only a theory, and like all theories, are just only theories. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:07, 30 May 2011 (EDT)
i think this is horrible considering the majority of conservatism is a joke,less then one third of americans are conservative.fox news audiance have iq's below par the average and studies show people who vote republican have an iq nearly 5 points below average. we need to step up and educate the newer conservatives so our views can be respected.