Changes

Line 91: Line 91:     
::As I mentioned originally, none of these issues is going to put off the confident and intelligent student for long, but they do reveal to such a student a lack of attention to detail on the question setting which I don't think sets a good example.--[[User:QPR|QPR]] 16:34, 17 December 2011 (EST)
 
::As I mentioned originally, none of these issues is going to put off the confident and intelligent student for long, but they do reveal to such a student a lack of attention to detail on the question setting which I don't think sets a good example.--[[User:QPR|QPR]] 16:34, 17 December 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
:::As far as the Enigma goes, yes a "first" does need to be added. Who broke the unsteckered 3-rotor Enigma? Who broke the steckered 3-rotor? Who broke the steckered 3-rotor with five rotors to choose from? Who broke the M4? Who broke the Abwehr Enigma? Who broke the Naval procedures? All of these were quite separate cryptanalytical achievements based on quite different principles. If you don't care about these differences then no correct answer is possible, because the British were offered the (unsteckered) commercial Enigma-C in 1928 and rejected it because they could break it. --[[User:HarryPagett|HarryPagett]] 14:33, 22 December 2011 (EST)
    
== Extra Credit ==
 
== Extra Credit ==
97

edits