Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,924
edits
Changes
mLine 3:
Line 3: − + − + − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! Line 204:
Line 11: − + − + − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! − − − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! Line 720:
Line 215: − − − − − == Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ == − − Sharon – you guys are not grownups, in your own words your ‘god’s children’. And this website censors and deletes all intelligent discourse. Just like you… Sharon. But we forgive you. − − We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes! − − We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and subvert ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock. − − Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user:conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing! − − We want you to carry on… but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism. − − May the gods bless your ignorance, − − Your servant, − − >J.E>N_S<E>N_ − − p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted? We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!
Reverted edits by DtstpmJ (talk) to last revision by SharonW
[[User:SharonW/sandbox1]]
[[User:SharonW/sandbox1]]
[[User:SharonW/sandbox2]]
[[User:SharonW/sandbox2]]
== Conservapedia – ‘try grown up discourse for a change’ ==
==Columbus==
Good catch! --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:42, 13 October 2009 (EDT)
== Politician page divisions for copy/paste ==
== Politician page divisions for copy/paste ==
==Military service==
==Military service==
==Private sector==
==Private sector==
==Political career==
==Political career==
==Political views==
==Political views==
==Public criticism==
==Public criticism==
==Personal life==
==Personal life==
==Post political career==
==Post political career==
==Image Uploads==
==Image Uploads==
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:07, 16 November 2011 (EST)
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:07, 16 November 2011 (EST)