Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,884
edits
Changes
mLine 36:
Line 36: − +
→Stop the edit war!
Shouldn't we agree on something instead of keep reverting everything ? My question is why do we hide this gossip whil we keep the gossip on democrats pages ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 22:01, 22 January 2012 (EST)
Shouldn't we agree on something instead of keep reverting everything ? My question is why do we hide this gossip whil we keep the gossip on democrats pages ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 22:01, 22 January 2012 (EST)
:(ec)[http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Quick_reference Conservapedia articles tone, style, and content should be written with an American, conservative and/or Christian orientation or focus. ''] If you're referring to debates on several other pages about the liberal concept of "open marriage", the Clinton marriage, as accurately cited from numerous sources, fits the definition of "open marriage" on both the sexual and non-sexual planes. In the Gingrich instance, ABC News correspondence, along with other liberal, mainstream, non--conservative and anti-conservative sources and journalists, clearly attack Gingrich's personal life to cause harm and personal suffering. These same journalists and news organizations in the cases the Clinton family and Obama family have repeated stated a candidates personal life, and that of their families and children, are off limits and out of bounds. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:15, 22 January 2012 (EST)
:(ec)[http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Quick_reference ''Conservapedia articles tone, style, and content should be written with an American, conservative and/or Christian orientation or focus. ''] If you're referring to debates on several other pages about the liberal concept of "open marriage", the Clinton marriage, as accurately cited from numerous sources, fits the definition of "open marriage" on both the sexual and non-sexual planes. In the Gingrich instance, ABC News correspondence, along with other liberal, mainstream, non--conservative and anti-conservative sources and journalists, clearly attack Gingrich's personal life to cause harm and personal suffering. These same journalists and news organizations in the cases the Clinton family and Obama family have repeated stated a candidates personal life, and that of their families and children, are off limits and out of bounds. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:15, 22 January 2012 (EST)