Changes

:::::::Here is the contact information for an organization with a broad base of supporters from different backgrounds: National Right to Life Committee (202) 626-8800. Why not ask them instead of taking a more speculative approach? It seems to me that the more speculative an encyclopedia article is, the less encyclopedic it is. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:45, 24 January 2012 (EST)

:::::::Here is the contact information for an organization with a broad base of supporters from different backgrounds: National Right to Life Committee (202) 626-8800. Why not ask them instead of taking a more speculative approach? It seems to me that the more speculative an encyclopedia article is, the less encyclopedic it is. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:45, 24 January 2012 (EST)

I agree with User:Conservative: The statement ''The influence of the March for Life is approximately 20 times its attendance, as the average person who attends communicates his participation to 20 others'' is purely speculative, and stating it as a fact without further research makes the whole section looking dubious! Can't you rephrase the paragraph without made-up numbers? Or qualify them somewhat, like: ''obviously millions of people are influenced by the march of life?''

I agree with User:Conservative: The statement ''The influence of the March for Life is approximately 20 times its attendance, as the average person who attends communicates his participation to 20 others'' is purely speculative, and stating it as a fact without further research makes the whole section looking dubious! Can't you rephrase the paragraph without made-up numbers? Or qualify them somewhat, like: ''obviously millions of people are influenced by the March for Life?''

[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:51, 25 January 2012 (EST)

[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:51, 25 January 2012 (EST)