Changes

m
Reverted edits by PhilipN (talk) to last revision by Baobab
Line 1: Line 1: −
In [[Britain]], where [[atheism]] dominates{{citation needed}}, people dislike [[underdog]]s and tend to root for the contestant who is favored to win{{citation needed}}.  The opposite is true in the [[Christian]] [[United States]], where the underdogs have traditionally been the favorites of the people{{citation needed}}.
+
In [[Britain]], where [[atheism]] dominates, people dislike [[underdog]]s and tend to root for the contestant who is favored to win.  The opposite is true in the [[Christian]] [[United States]], where the underdogs have traditionally been the favorites of the people.
   −
However, as the [[liberal media]] in the United States becomes increasingly atheistic{{citation needed}}, victories by underdogs are increasingly met with dismay or disapproval{{citation needed}}.
+
However, as the [[liberal media]] in the United States becomes increasingly atheistic, victories by underdogs are increasingly met with dismay or disapproval.
   −
The failure by atheists to build hospitals{{citation needed}} illustrates their tendencies not to help the weak.  The underdog epitomizes the weaker side in a contest, and atheists are fine with the underdog losing{{citation needed}}.
+
The failure by atheists to build hospitals illustrates their tendencies not to help the weak.  The underdog epitomizes the weaker side in a contest, and atheists are fine with the underdog losing.
    
Why do atheists dislike underdogs?
 
Why do atheists dislike underdogs?
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,551

edits