Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907
edits
Changes
→United Kingdom
::You make an interesting point. I suggest you take it up on the relevant page [[Talk:Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs?]]. It may be that the principle has need of some fine-tuning. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 18:06, 7 February 2012 (EST)
::You make an interesting point. I suggest you take it up on the relevant page [[Talk:Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs?]]. It may be that the principle has need of some fine-tuning. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 18:06, 7 February 2012 (EST)
:::The principle is in need of some deleting and I think you know that as well as I do. Much as I admire Mr Schlafly I think he's wrong about this. The Brits are famous for loving underdogs. Half their politicians are constantly bitching about how they love underdogs more than people who succeed. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 18:08, 7 February 2012 (EST)
:::The principle is in need of some deleting and I think you know that as well as I do. Much as I admire Mr Schlafly I think he's wrong about this. The Brits are famous for loving underdogs. Half their politicians are constantly bitching about how they love underdogs more than people who succeed. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 18:08, 7 February 2012 (EST)
::::I would agree that the entire concept is bunk. I would not agree that this ''in itself'' means it is not acceptably referenced according to the standards and precedents practised by Conservapedia. Senior Admins, particularly THE senior Admin can and do control the editorial policy of the site. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:48, 7 February 2012 (EST)