nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
→Inappropriate copying
::*Well, I certainly don't expect you to, Rob, even though it has been explained many times, users can slap the copy they want to add here, on the talk page. But that isn't "good enough", I understand. In the meantime, I added the citation. ;-) Another non-issue made into a "issue". People have time to carp and complain, yet little time to actually create articles, that I do understand. The whole point is, if someone can take the time to add copy, and add templates, they should also have the time to do a simple web search for the missing citation. As I hastily created the article, Andy and Hoji were each adding citations and checking it. I am sorry it wasn't up to someones expectations. I tried many times to resolve this locking issue, but people just switched the channel rather than try to accomodate another point of view. So be it. User "Conservative" has the right idea about dealing with "complainers", IMO. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 17:22, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
::*Well, I certainly don't expect you to, Rob, even though it has been explained many times, users can slap the copy they want to add here, on the talk page. But that isn't "good enough", I understand. In the meantime, I added the citation. ;-) Another non-issue made into a "issue". People have time to carp and complain, yet little time to actually create articles, that I do understand. The whole point is, if someone can take the time to add copy, and add templates, they should also have the time to do a simple web search for the missing citation. As I hastily created the article, Andy and Hoji were each adding citations and checking it. I am sorry it wasn't up to someones expectations. I tried many times to resolve this locking issue, but people just switched the channel rather than try to accomodate another point of view. So be it. User "Conservative" has the right idea about dealing with "complainers", IMO. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 17:22, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
==Inappropriate copying==
==Copying==
The section of this article labeled “2007 Masters Tournament” seems to be in violation of the rules of Conservapedia. It is largely copied form the Des Moines Register article on the event (some sections nearly word for word) and yet the page only labels the Register article as one of the “References”. The register article is here <ref>Des Moines Register [http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070408/SPORTS14/70408005/-1/buildasx] </ref>.
The section of this article labeled “2007 Masters Tournament” seems to be in violation of the rules of Conservapedia. It is largely copied form the Des Moines Register article on the event (some sections nearly word for word) and yet the page only labels the Register article as one of the “References”. The register article is here <ref>Des Moines Register [http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070408/SPORTS14/70408005/-1/buildasx] </ref>.
Someone who can edit this article ought to change it quickly, especially as it is liked from the front page. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 17:41, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Someone who can edit this article ought to change it quickly, especially as it is liked from the front page. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 17:41, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
*I will be happy to unlock it, if you mean to "repair" it, Reginod. Otherwise, I would inform you that direct copying is not against our rules, and we do not insist that contributors para-phrase and distill everything into original copy. For a short article like this, one could only use so many words to distill into ones own words, eh? So do you wish to repair it? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 17:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>