Changes

'''E=mc&sup2;'''  is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all matter to light.<ref>The equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''. The equation only holds true if [[SI]] units are used, hence ''E'' is measured in [[joule]]s, ''m'' in [[kilogram|kilograms]] and ''c'' in [[metre]]s per [[second]]. In other systems of units an additional [[constant]] of proportionality would be required.  In [[natural units]], the equation simplifies to ''E''=''m''.</ref>  In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism).  Simply put, E=mc&sup2; is [[liberal]] claptrap.  As a general claim of equivalence between mass, energy and the speed of light, it was widely rejected at the time by the leading 20th century physicists, including [[Niels Bohr]].<ref>Bohr disagreed with Einstein's 1905 paper, and many other scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]]; Bohr later agreed to some parts of relativity but continued to defend [[quantum mechanics]] against criticism by Einstein.</ref>{{fact}}

'''E=mc&sup2;'''  is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all matter to light.<ref>The equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''.   In [[natural units]], where ''c'' is set to be ''1'' and without dimension, the equation becomes  ''E''=''m''.</ref>  In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism).  Simply put, E=mc&sup2; is [[liberal]] claptrap.  As a general claim of equivalence between mass, energy and the speed of light, it was widely rejected at the time by the leading 20th century physicists, including [[Niels Bohr]].<ref>Bohr disagreed with Einstein's 1905 paper, and many other scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]]; Bohr later agreed to some parts of relativity but continued to defend [[quantum mechanics]] against criticism by Einstein.</ref>{{fact}}

[[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]].

[[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]].