:Yes of course. It was this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AMainpageleft&action=historysubmit&diff=971165&oldid=970924 edit by Andy Schlafly]. There was some doubt raised subsequently about the correct interpretation of that posting, and although I personally was sceptical about Andy's claim, I thought it was appropriate that the views of the site leader and owner be reflected with the articles. We are, as I'm sure you appreciate, here merely at the leisure of the site owner. Our role is to facilitate the articulation of those views, whether we personally agree with them or not. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:26, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | :Yes of course. It was this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AMainpageleft&action=historysubmit&diff=971165&oldid=970924 edit by Andy Schlafly]. There was some doubt raised subsequently about the correct interpretation of that posting, and although I personally was sceptical about Andy's claim, I thought it was appropriate that the views of the site leader and owner be reflected with the articles. We are, as I'm sure you appreciate, here merely at the leisure of the site owner. Our role is to facilitate the articulation of those views, whether we personally agree with them or not. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:26, 9 April 2012 (EDT) |