Changes

255 bytes added ,  06:01, April 12, 2012
Line 474: Line 474:     
:::::::That sounds like what the paper would have to say in order to be published, yes.  An academic journal will withdraw its acceptance of a paper if it conflicts with the [[Theory of Relativity]] in any way.  Anyone in academia who criticizes the Theory of Relativity in any way, no matter how minor, is risking the end of his professional career due to liberal orthodoxy.  [[Robert Dicke]], the greatest American physicist ever, was denied the [[Nobel Prize]] because he criticized the Theory of Relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:07, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::::That sounds like what the paper would have to say in order to be published, yes.  An academic journal will withdraw its acceptance of a paper if it conflicts with the [[Theory of Relativity]] in any way.  Anyone in academia who criticizes the Theory of Relativity in any way, no matter how minor, is risking the end of his professional career due to liberal orthodoxy.  [[Robert Dicke]], the greatest American physicist ever, was denied the [[Nobel Prize]] because he criticized the Theory of Relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:07, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
::::::::And that doesn't sound like someone who actually read the paper! Drawing your conclusions just from your interpretation of the abstract (and wishful thinking) doesn't make a compelling argument. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:01, 12 April 2012 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits