Changes

3,318 bytes added ,  10:26, April 17, 2012
add text moved from Hearsay page, with a new introduction
Line 1: Line 1: −
#REDIRECT [[Hearsay#Wikipedia and the hearsay society]]
+
[[Image:Jdfu6r7.JPG|right|thumb|''Sapere aude!'' The Enlightenment thinker [[John Locke]].]]
 +
The '''hearsay society''' is a term used to describe a prevailing current of thought, stemming in large part from the popularity of [[Wikipedia]], that discourages making statements unless a reference can be found to others having said them already. This is a form of individual cowardice, and can lead to the propagation of misleading, incorrect or deliberately untrue information, while some abandon even the attempt at using their own [[logic]] or thinking for themselves.
 +
 
 +
==Wikipedia's role==
 +
The online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]] is fundamentally based on hearsay. Assertions made in Wikipedia articles are required to be supported by references; this superficially gives an impression of rigor, but in practice it leads to a [[parrot]]ting of the opinions of others and a negation of the individual's ability to use his intelligence to make connections and insights based on [[logic]]. Wikipedia typically dismisses logical inferences as original research, which, according to Wikipedia policy, is contrary to the pillar that Wikipedia articles present topics from a neutral point of view and represent the major points of view in a "balanced and impartial manner", and they are swiftly deleted, regardless of their insight or obvious truth.
 +
 
 +
While original research is permitted on other Wikimedia projects, such as Wikiversity and Wikibooks, these are typically obscure and have negligible impact compared to Wikipedia. They may even have been established deliberately to channel original thought away from the mass exposure it would receive on Wikipedia.
 +
 
 +
Thanks to the growth and popularity of Wikipedia, the flawed expectation that all statements must be referenced has spread elsewhere, both in online communities and wider society, to the point where many are reluctant to express any view unless others have said it first. The result is a '''hearsay society''', where popularly-espoused "facts" are repeated and circulated endlessly, while truths and new insights are shut out, ignored or actively [[censorship|censored]].
 +
 
 +
[[Image:392.jpg|right|thumb|180px|[[Voltaire]]: An opponent of [[censorship]] who would not have approved of the hearsay society.]]
 +
Ironically, this subservience to hearsay and the authority of others is antithetical to the spirit of the [[Enlightenment]] which gave birth to the first encyclopedia and the [[scientific method]] - even though many of its most diligent proponents would claim to be scientists themselves. The motto of the Enlightenment was ''Sapere aude!'' - ie "Dare to know [for yourself]!" rather than uncritically accept what you are told. This has been twisted out of all recognition by today's self-proclaimed "scientific community" and other groups, as they claim to idolize the great scientific thinkers while rejecting the spirit of inquiry that brought them their success.
 +
 
 +
The hearsay society attitude also compares unfavorably with [[Voltaire]]'s famous maxim "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the [[death]] your right to say it." Those who insist on censoring obvious truths on the pretext that no one can be found to have said them before are effectively saying the exact opposite: "I do not necessarily dispute what you say, but I am nevertheless going to try to stop you from saying it."
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613

edits